<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Backup Software Harmful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/</link>
	<description>Mac OS X Gordian Knots Smashed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:17:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Silverkeeper and Windows servers &#171; Kassblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-57078</link>
		<dc:creator>Silverkeeper and Windows servers &#171; Kassblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-57078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] These two sites were most informative: Complete, free Mac backup Mac Backup Software Harmful [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These two sites were most informative: Complete, free Mac backup Mac Backup Software Harmful [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Information Secrets - Pays 75% And Converts Very Well. &#124; 7Wins.eu</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-56541</link>
		<dc:creator>Information Secrets - Pays 75% And Converts Very Well. &#124; 7Wins.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-56541</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] &#8220;Washington&#8217;s Secret War on the Dollar&#8221; &#124; Uncommon WisdomDiscover The Secret and Easy Way To Buy Products Online &#8211; It&#8217;s Simple! &#124; Fix Software Errorsplasticsfuture &#187; Mac Backup Software Harmful [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Washington&#8217;s Secret War on the Dollar&#8221; | Uncommon WisdomDiscover The Secret and Easy Way To Buy Products Online &#8211; It&#8217;s Simple! | Fix Software Errorsplasticsfuture &raquo; Mac Backup Software Harmful [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Lanham</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-51263</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Lanham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-51263</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been using SuperDuper! now for years after having used Retrospect Express for many years and I am very satisfied. It maintains creation and modification dates which Retrospect was not doing (I found this out when actually having to use one of my backups after a major problem). Thanks for the great article!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using SuperDuper! now for years after having used Retrospect Express for many years and I am very satisfied. It maintains creation and modification dates which Retrospect was not doing (I found this out when actually having to use one of my backups after a major problem). Thanks for the great article!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backup Software</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-50444</link>
		<dc:creator>Backup Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-50444</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Just thought this may help some what ( I know its not for leopard ( 10.5.x ) but should give you a reasonable idea  plasticsfuture Mac Backup Software Harmful  According to that superduper is the best one  http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDup...scription.html [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just thought this may help some what ( I know its not for leopard ( 10.5.x ) but should give you a reasonable idea  plasticsfuture Mac Backup Software Harmful  According to that superduper is the best one  <a href="http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDup...scription.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDup&#8230;scription.html</a> [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [Mac] file copy &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-49449</link>
		<dc:creator>[Mac] file copy &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-49449</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Re: [Mac] file copy   In article &lt;mailman.2013.1245770022.8015.python-list&gt;, Philip Semanchuk &lt;philip&gt; wrote:  &gt; I think resource forks are now stored as extended attributes, and  No  &gt; Apple&#039;s version of cp is aware of extended attributes.  Yes, but the manual doesn&#039;t say to what extent, nor anything about ACLs  &gt; Try this -- create a text file via terminal using &lt;code&gt;touch foo.txt&lt;/code&gt;. In  Don&#039;t have time to do something like the outdated http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...tware-harmful/  Was hoping someone already knows...  &gt; To the OP -- I remember reading somewhere that xattr is written in &gt; Python. You might find it useful or even be able to import it directly.  It uses a C extension, but I could import it if I wanted to re-invent the wheel ;)  -- Tobias Weber [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Re: [Mac] file copy   In article &lt;mailman.2013.1245770022.8015.python-list&gt;, Philip Semanchuk &lt;philip&gt; wrote:  &gt; I think resource forks are now stored as extended attributes, and  No  &gt; Apple&#8217;s version of cp is aware of extended attributes.  Yes, but the manual doesn&#8217;t say to what extent, nor anything about ACLs  &gt; Try this &#8212; create a text file via terminal using <code>touch foo.txt</code>. In  Don&#8217;t have time to do something like the outdated <a href="http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...tware-harmful/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/&#8230;tware-harmful/</a>  Was hoping someone already knows&#8230;  &gt; To the OP &#8212; I remember reading somewhere that xattr is written in &gt; Python. You might find it useful or even be able to import it directly.  It uses a C extension, but I could import it if I wanted to re-invent the wheel ;)  &#8212; Tobias Weber [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Grifka</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-48778</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Grifka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-48778</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Any thoughts about BounceBack *CMS Products). I have been using it for 6 years with no problems. I appreciate your thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts about BounceBack *CMS Products). I have been using it for 6 years with no problems. I appreciate your thoughts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-47095</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-47095</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I also vote for SuperDuper!  Software is reasonably priced and support is very good.  I recommend it to my clients and use it myself.  I like the fact that SuperDuper! keeps up with updates to Apple OS X and has a track record of doing so.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also vote for SuperDuper!  Software is reasonably priced and support is very good.  I recommend it to my clients and use it myself.  I like the fact that SuperDuper! keeps up with updates to Apple OS X and has a track record of doing so.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backup roundup &#124; hilpers</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-45336</link>
		<dc:creator>Backup roundup &#124; hilpers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-45336</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Backup roundup      Someone&#039;s done some in-depth testing of backup solutions, particularly in regard to metadata preservation. You might be surprised at the outcome - I was (I thought Retrospect was half-decent, and Carbon Copy Cloner was bulletproof)  http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...tware-harmful/  -z- [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Backup roundup      Someone&#8217;s done some in-depth testing of backup solutions, particularly in regard to metadata preservation. You might be surprised at the outcome &#8211; I was (I thought Retrospect was half-decent, and Carbon Copy Cloner was bulletproof)  <a href="http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...tware-harmful/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/&#8230;tware-harmful/</a>  -z- [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Backup Software Harmful (Blog) &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-45326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Backup Software Harmful (Blog) &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-45326</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Mac Backup Software Harmful (Blog)     Mac Backup Software Harmful (Blog) http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...tware-harmful/ [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mac Backup Software Harmful (Blog)     Mac Backup Software Harmful (Blog) <a href="http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...tware-harmful/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/&#8230;tware-harmful/</a> [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compressing .dmg files - Page 2 &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-45319</link>
		<dc:creator>Compressing .dmg files - Page 2 &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-45319</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Re: Compressing .dmg files     In article &lt;050420070934368706%philip&gt;, Phil Stripling &lt;philip&gt; wrote: &gt; I compressed a subset the original materials using ditto to archive and &gt; zip a smaller directory. It went from 2.4GB to 1.9GB. For those who &gt; don&#039;t mind working from the command line, ditto is in the man pages. &gt; &gt; I understand the desire for (and very much appreciate) the GUI &gt; interface on the Mac, but there are occasions when it&#039;s unnecessary, &gt; and compressing files is one of those occasions for me. Mileage &gt; variations welcomed.  Just one more piece of info, Phil, in case you are at all concerned with the metadata that some others are. According to this site:  http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...ftware-harmful  ditto (used by Carbon Copy Cloner in the comparison table) evidently doesn&#039;t maintain some of the metadata properly.  --Fred [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Re: Compressing .dmg files     In article &lt;050420070934368706%philip&gt;, Phil Stripling &lt;philip&gt; wrote: &gt; I compressed a subset the original materials using ditto to archive and &gt; zip a smaller directory. It went from 2.4GB to 1.9GB. For those who &gt; don&#8217;t mind working from the command line, ditto is in the man pages. &gt; &gt; I understand the desire for (and very much appreciate) the GUI &gt; interface on the Mac, but there are occasions when it&#8217;s unnecessary, &gt; and compressing files is one of those occasions for me. Mileage &gt; variations welcomed.  Just one more piece of info, Phil, in case you are at all concerned with the metadata that some others are. According to this site:  <a href="http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...ftware-harmful" rel="nofollow">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/&#8230;ftware-harmful</a>  ditto (used by Carbon Copy Cloner in the comparison table) evidently doesn&#8217;t maintain some of the metadata properly.  &#8211;Fred [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Automating Disk Utility cloning - MacNN Forums</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-45312</link>
		<dc:creator>Automating Disk Utility cloning - MacNN Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-45312</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Originally Posted by Simon&#160;    I can assure you it works just fine on several Leopard systems I have.    &quot;It works&quot; may not be descriptive enough. What ancient version of rsync does it use? What level of metadata and extended attributes does it preserve? Once again, the article i linked to (in the other thread) gave RSyncX version 2.1 a &quot;Not recommended&quot; score:  issues with some BSD flags,  issues when uappnd set on directory,  doesnâ€™t preserve HFS+ extended attributes, ACLs [uses rsync_hfs] [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by Simon&nbsp;    I can assure you it works just fine on several Leopard systems I have.    &quot;It works&quot; may not be descriptive enough. What ancient version of rsync does it use? What level of metadata and extended attributes does it preserve? Once again, the article i linked to (in the other thread) gave RSyncX version 2.1 a &quot;Not recommended&quot; score:  issues with some BSD flags,  issues when uappnd set on directory,  doesnâ€™t preserve HFS+ extended attributes, ACLs [uses rsync_hfs] [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#34;Migration&#34; auf neue Festplatte &#124; hilpers</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-45282</link>
		<dc:creator>&#34;Migration&#34; auf neue Festplatte &#124; hilpers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-45282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Re: &quot;Migration&quot; auf neue Festplatte     Florian Zschocke schrieb: &gt; Malte Rosenau &lt;mrosena&gt; wrote: &gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; Alte Platte auf 10.4 updaten, neue Platte Löschen, mit Carbon Copy &gt;&gt;&gt; Cloner alte Platte auf neue Clonen. Das ging bei mir immer fehlerfrei. &gt;&gt; Bei mir bislang auch. Es gibt aber Gründe, die gegen CCC &gt;&gt; (und viele andere Tools) und für SuperDuper sprechen.  Ist hier schon mal gepostet worden:  http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...tware-harmful/ [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Re: &quot;Migration&quot; auf neue Festplatte     Florian Zschocke schrieb: &gt; Malte Rosenau &lt;mrosena&gt; wrote: &gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; Alte Platte auf 10.4 updaten, neue Platte Löschen, mit Carbon Copy &gt;&gt;&gt; Cloner alte Platte auf neue Clonen. Das ging bei mir immer fehlerfrei. &gt;&gt; Bei mir bislang auch. Es gibt aber Gründe, die gegen CCC &gt;&gt; (und viele andere Tools) und für SuperDuper sprechen.  Ist hier schon mal gepostet worden:  <a href="http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/...tware-harmful/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/&#8230;tware-harmful/</a> [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cornelius</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-45219</link>
		<dc:creator>cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-45219</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I had been using a registered copy of SD before this article was linked by a user in Apple Discussions. I was glad to have my preconceived notions (and experience) confirmed. Has this article been updated since Leopard&#039;s Time Machine? I do not, myself, use Time Machine, or Leopard for that matter. However, I have seen the question asked in AD and wonder if one supplants the other, or whether they work in sync.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been using a registered copy of SD before this article was linked by a user in Apple Discussions. I was glad to have my preconceived notions (and experience) confirmed. Has this article been updated since Leopard&#8217;s Time Machine? I do not, myself, use Time Machine, or Leopard for that matter. However, I have seen the question asked in AD and wonder if one supplants the other, or whether they work in sync.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernhard Pieber</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-45003</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernhard Pieber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-45003</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maurits,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you very much for all the effort you put into your research! I think it is still very valuable. I wish I had stumbled upon it earlier, though.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bernhard&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maurits,</p>

<p>Thank you very much for all the effort you put into your research! I think it is still very valuable. I wish I had stumbled upon it earlier, though.</p>

<p>Bernhard</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Killion</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-44568</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Killion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-44568</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Extremely valuable page -- thank you!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mention should be made of a crucial failing of Retrospect:  As a default, backing up with Retrospect does NOT save any sparseimage files!  The intention was to prevent massive consumption of backup space every time a sparseimage file changed, which would happen every time one of the files it contains changed.  But that means that if you have secured some data by putting it into a disk image saved as a sparseimage (perhaps with a password), Retrospect doesn&#039;t save it at all!  I only discovered this after a hard disk crash when I found that my &quot;secured&quot; files weren&#039;t saved at all by Retrospect.  There is an option to change this default setting (which in true Retrospect fashion is buried in the horrible interface), but the default is you&#039;re unprotected and Retrospect doesn&#039;t tell you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely valuable page &#8212; thank you!</p>

<p>Mention should be made of a crucial failing of Retrospect:  As a default, backing up with Retrospect does NOT save any sparseimage files!  The intention was to prevent massive consumption of backup space every time a sparseimage file changed, which would happen every time one of the files it contains changed.  But that means that if you have secured some data by putting it into a disk image saved as a sparseimage (perhaps with a password), Retrospect doesn&#8217;t save it at all!  I only discovered this after a hard disk crash when I found that my &#8220;secured&#8221; files weren&#8217;t saved at all by Retrospect.  There is an option to change this default setting (which in true Retrospect fashion is buried in the horrible interface), but the default is you&#8217;re unprotected and Retrospect doesn&#8217;t tell you.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liam</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-40765</link>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-40765</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you used presstore before, it has been given good reviews, but you seem to have an encyclopedic knowlage of  mac back software and i could do with your opinion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Liam&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you used presstore before, it has been given good reviews, but you seem to have an encyclopedic knowlage of  mac back software and i could do with your opinion.</p>

<p>Thanks</p>

<p>Liam</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bengt77</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-40265</link>
		<dc:creator>Bengt77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-40265</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another vote for SuperDuper! Indeed a most excellent backup/cloning solution. Use it weekly (set to clone incrementally), which gives me peace of mind. I&#039;m about to switch to a dual backup strategy, though.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since my current backup drive is getting too small for all the stuff I have on my system drive, I&#039;ve ordered a new dual drive enclosure from OWC. I intend to use that as a RAID1 setup for my weekly SuperDuper! clones. My current backup drive will then be used for continuous Time Machine backups. Some might call it over the top, but over the time I&#039;ve learned that you can&#039;t be sure/secure enough, concerning backups.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another vote for SuperDuper! Indeed a most excellent backup/cloning solution. Use it weekly (set to clone incrementally), which gives me peace of mind. I&#8217;m about to switch to a dual backup strategy, though.</p>

<p>Since my current backup drive is getting too small for all the stuff I have on my system drive, I&#8217;ve ordered a new dual drive enclosure from OWC. I intend to use that as a RAID1 setup for my weekly SuperDuper! clones. My current backup drive will then be used for continuous Time Machine backups. Some might call it over the top, but over the time I&#8217;ve learned that you can&#8217;t be sure/secure enough, concerning backups.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Mozy review: know its limitations before you need it &#8212; electric counterpoint, by dan ray</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-6/#comment-40195</link>
		<dc:creator>My Mozy review: know its limitations before you need it &#8212; electric counterpoint, by dan ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-40195</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Now, let me say up front that part of my problem here was an unrealistic expectation about how Mac restores work. I know that all the user preferences live in ~/Library/, but I couldn&#8217;t help backing up all kinds of system folders as well. I thought that I had the same machine as before, so simply copying the old files over the new system-wide would bring me back up and running like my old drive had never died. It didn&#8217;t, of course, and an hour later I&#8217;d reinstalled Leopard and was ready to try again. This time, I checked the files as I was moving them onto my hard drive. Oddly, the permissions on every file had been reset to read-only. This might have been Mozy&#8217;s fault (apparently Mac backup software struggles with metadata) or it might have been mine (maybe reinstalling my OS changed my user account), but it was very annoying to have to piece everything back into place and then modify permissions by hand. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, let me say up front that part of my problem here was an unrealistic expectation about how Mac restores work. I know that all the user preferences live in ~/Library/, but I couldn&#8217;t help backing up all kinds of system folders as well. I thought that I had the same machine as before, so simply copying the old files over the new system-wide would bring me back up and running like my old drive had never died. It didn&#8217;t, of course, and an hour later I&#8217;d reinstalled Leopard and was ready to try again. This time, I checked the files as I was moving them onto my hard drive. Oddly, the permissions on every file had been reset to read-only. This might have been Mozy&#8217;s fault (apparently Mac backup software struggles with metadata) or it might have been mine (maybe reinstalling my OS changed my user account), but it was very annoying to have to piece everything back into place and then modify permissions by hand. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corie</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-5/#comment-36066</link>
		<dc:creator>corie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-36066</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder how Memeo LifeAgent fare in this test. Has anyone tried it? http://www.memeo.com/lifeagent&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how Memeo LifeAgent fare in this test. Has anyone tried it? <a href="http://www.memeo.com/lifeagent" rel="nofollow">http://www.memeo.com/lifeagent</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Wallis</title>
		<link>http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/comment-page-5/#comment-35026</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/mac-backup-software-harmful/#comment-35026</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;how does timemachine compare to superduper?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how does timemachine compare to superduper?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->